Our guides and provider directory use desk research: official filings, provider documents and original reports checked against the claims they support. The directory is alphabetical and unscored. We distinguish published capabilities from delivery terms, missing information from unavailable services, and a provider's fee from a family's total cost. AI tools support research, claim checks and drafting; FOQ LTDA is responsible for final review and publication.
Responsibility for the research
FOQ LTDA publishes Family Office Quarters and controls publication decisions. Providers can supply evidence and corrections, but they do not approve coverage. The same source standards apply to every provider.
The research uses AI agents to inspect primary web sources and record claim-level evidence. AI tools also draft the copy. The editorial policy describes their roles.
The provider set
The initial directory covers 11 named providers. It is a selected research catalog, not a census of the US market or an exhaustive assessment of every candidate considered during research.
Entries compare the public information available for the named brand, entity and service. Some providers have several affiliates or programs; a filing for one adviser does not establish the terms of every service sold under the wider brand. Incomplete public information remains a limit on the comparison, rather than a reason to fill a field by inference.
Definitions used in comparisons
| Term | How we use it |
|---|---|
Single-family office |
An operating description for an office serving one family. It does not by itself establish the office's legal or regulatory position. |
Multi-family office |
An operating description for an organization serving multiple families. Ownership, shared staffing and service scope require separate evidence. |
Outsourced or virtual office |
An arrangement relying on outside providers for specified functions, potentially coordinated by a small internal team. The label does not identify the contracting parties. |
“Private family office” or operator model |
A description that needs explanation of the actual ownership, work, employment and authority. We do not treat it as a distinct legal status. |
Direct service |
The provider states that it performs the work. This establishes a published capability, not quality or inclusion in every engagement. |
Affiliate service |
A related legal entity provides the service. The entity, agreement and charges may differ from the main advisory relationship. |
Coordination or referral |
Organizing work by another professional, or directing a client to one. Neither establishes direct delivery by the referring firm. |
Net worth |
Assets less liabilities; it is not interchangeable with liquid assets or a provider's fee base. |
Investable assets |
The asset measure stated by the source or provider. We preserve its wording and exclusions rather than substitute net worth. |
Assets under management, advisement or supervision |
Different source-defined measures. We retain the reported label, entity and date; we do not combine them into one scale comparison. |
SEC regulatory assets under management |
A filing measure for the named registered adviser. We distinguish it from a brand's broader reported assets. |
Minimum |
A specified eligibility or spending condition. An account minimum, annual fee minimum and published assessment of fit are different facts. |
The model descriptions draw on Campden/RBC's September 2026 report. They are separate from the SEC's specific family-office exclusion, whose conditions concern defined family clients, ownership, control and public holding-out as an investment adviser. 1 2
Sources, dates and legal entities
The source must fit the claim. The research uses the following order of inquiry:
- Regulators and official filings. SEC guidance establishes the terms of the family-office exclusion. An adviser's Form ADV or Form CRS supports facts about that named entity and the services the document covers.
- Provider documents. Current service pages, disclosures and fee documents support what the provider says it offers. They do not independently establish service quality or what every client receives.
- Original research. Survey findings retain their population, geography, fieldwork or reporting period and measure. An average from selected offices is not a quote for a family's engagement.
- Secondary material. Other reporting or a company social profile may supply context or a research lead. A narrow description can be identified as such; it does not substantiate an unverified fee or operating model.
Each material figure needs its source, date, entity, service and measure. A date beside a source can refer to the document, the data period or the day it was checked; those dates serve different purposes. An undated page is identified as undated.
Where sources differ, first check whether they describe different legal entities, services or periods. A brand-level service page and an adviser filing can both be accurate while covering different work. If the discrepancy cannot be resolved, the draft identifies the uncertainty or omits the disputed figure.
Missing and conflicting information
| Evidence label | Meaning |
|---|---|
Sourced |
The cited material supports the stated fact, with its relevant conditions and date. |
Not publicly disclosed |
The sources checked did not state the information. This does not establish that the service is unavailable or that the provider has no minimum. |
Unverified |
A claim or description was found but sufficient current evidence was not obtained. The accompanying note explains the limit. |
Unpublished material is a research lead. It cannot establish public pricing or service terms without corroboration. We also avoid carrying a historical fee into a current comparison when a newer document exists but its relevant terms have not been checked.
Inclusion and order
| Comparison choice | Treatment in the initial directory |
|---|---|
Provider scope |
Eleven named providers in the initial research set; no claim of whole-market coverage. |
Order |
Alphabetical by the directory's public provider name. |
Scores and weights |
None. There is no numerical ranking or overall winner. |
Comparison fields |
Published model, relevant legal entities, US availability, services, fee basis, stated minimums and dated asset measures where supported. |
Examples in guides |
Used to explain a documented service or distinction relevant to the subject. They do not establish a shortlist or personal suitability. |
Incomplete fields |
Shown with a meaningful evidence note or omitted when a reliable comparison cannot be made. |
Research actually performed
For the guides and directory, research agents opened official web pages and available filings, checked original reports and retained concise records of the claims, supporting passages and limitations.
The resulting material is desk research. It does not include firsthand use of family-office services, provider interviews or an assessment of a family's personal circumstances. Public claims about a capability remain attributed provider descriptions.
Updates and corrections
The initial research date is October 19, 2026. Page-level dates identify the research performed; they do not guarantee that a provider has made no subsequent change.
Send corrections to [email protected], with the page URL, disputed statement and supporting source. Include the document date and relevant legal entity or service where possible. The publisher is responsible for assessing the evidence and deciding what changes. See correction instructions.
Compensation and placement
As of October 19, 2026, there are no active paid listings, referral or lead-fee arrangements, affiliate commissions, sponsorships or advertising. The commercial disclosure states the current position. Alphabetical directory order is not a paid position or a quality ranking.
Sources
- Primary: Campden Wealth/RBC, The North America Family Office Report 2026, published September 29, 2026, especially pp. 8 and 44–45. Accessed October 19, 2026. Operational taxonomy; terminology can differ between sources and providers.
- Primary: SEC, Family Office: A Small Entity Compliance Guide, 2011 rule. Accessed October 19, 2026. The specific federal investment-adviser exclusion, including conditions and exceptions.
Update trail
Methodology information checked October 19, 2026. Request a correction.